@article {494,
	title = {Novyi rod Sipunkul Cutlerensis gen. n. dlya vida Aspidosiphon rutilofuscus (Sipunculac Golfingiidae). ____________},
	journal = {Zoologicheski Zhurnal},
	volume = {70},
	number = {11},
	year = {1991},
	note = {HAS AN ENGLISH ABSTRACT THAT ENDS WITH ... RESEMBLANCE ... TO OTHER G{\textquoteright}IDAE ... SEEMS TO BE DUE TO THEIR CONVERGENT EVOLUTION. !!! FOLLOWING TRANSLATRION BY PHILLIP IN CABOT LIBR. Phylum Sipuncula is a not large group but rather interesting group of Trochophore animals. Only recently determined in any finished way in supra-specific taxa by Gibbs \& Cutler, 1987. Phylum includes 6 families and 17 genera. In this work is described an 18th genus. The status of the species A. r. has changed several times. Fisher 1916 described this sp. and put it into the genus Aspido based on the fact that the posterior end of the animal supposedly has a conical shield with several longitudinal grooves and with a clear apex. Later it was shown that this was not correct C\&C 79:958. The outward appearance of the back end of the trunk changes much depending on the state of contraction and relaxation of the musculature during fixation. Apparently Fischer{\textquoteright}s determination was based on shrunken/shriveled specimens. The characteristics attributes of the genus Asp.; the pres. of ant. \& post. shields in A. rut. are not present. Additional description of the sp. by Fischer in 1922 noted that the example of Phas. (Asp) rut. does not differ from earlier paper. GOTO F4 However, Fischer did not join the them under 1 name. This was done later by Fisher 1952. There is a not entirely clear definition of another attribute. This lack of clarity for further placement of this species. Initially Fischer 1916 was pointed out that the spindle musc. was attached posteriorly to trunk. Murina 1967:1335 apparently was basing hers on the first description of Fischer when she placed this sp. in her new subgenus Golf. (Siph.). However, later more extensive description of the sp. Fischer 1922, noted that this muscle was not attached posteriorly. Furthermore, the Cutlers note that there are no traces of the spindle musc. at all. C\&C 79:961. Examination of several specimens kept in the Inst. Ocean. Ac. Sci. Mosc. confirm the second point of view. On the basis of its internal \& external morphology this sp. was moved to the subgenus G. (Phas.) Fisher 52, s\&e 72, c\&c 79 \& after revision of the gens Neph (C\&C 86) where it remained until the present time. The structure of the tentacular crown of rutil. is unique among sips. This was pointed out by Cutler who were the first to explore the structure of this with fully expanded introverts (c\&c 79:958). GO TO FILE D:POPKOV.PC FOR REST OF THIS.},
	pages = {132-134},
	keywords = {cutlerensis, new genus, rutilofusca},
	author = {Popkov, D. V.}
}
